Your Browser is not support JavaScript, some wrongs will appear maybe.
banner image Banner Flash
| Home | About Us | Activites and Projects | Geology of Taiwan | SiteMap | MOEA | Change to Chinese Page |
title image
:::
Introduction
Earlier Geologic Maps of Taiwan
Geographic Setting
General Geology And Geologic Provinces Of Taiwan
Explanation Of Legend And Representation Of Geologic Data
Eastern Central Range
Western Central Range Backbone Ridges
Western Foothills
Eastern Coastal Range
Geology Of The Hengchun Peninsula
Major Geologic Features Of Taiwan
Plate Tectonic Setting
References


:::Eastern Central Range
Introduction Occurrence and Lithology of Metamorphic Rocks Stratigraphy and Geologic Ages Radiometric Ages Metamorphic Belts Structural Features and Orogenic Events Metamorphic Events and Tectonic Evolution
Structural Features and Orogenic Events
The pre-Tertiary basement terrain involves a number of different tectonic and metamorphic stages as delineated by recent studies (Y. Wang, 1979; Ernst et al., 1981; Stanley et al., 1981). The effects of multi-stage recrystallization and deformation are shown by the divergence or superposition of foliation trends, incompatible mineral associations, and folding of schistosity and axial surfaces in the basement rocks. The presence of conglomeratic schists may also attest to different phases of orogenic pulsations. Thin pods and lenses of chloritoid rocks in the foliated marble and greenschist of the metamorphic complex represent metamorphosed lateritic soils (P. Y. Chen and Liou, 1979). The soils may indicate a stratigraphic break or unconformity on top of the marble and greenschist series.
The various metamorphic rocks in the basement have been deformed into a number of open, asymmetrical, or overturned folds and intricate flow folds after different phases of orogenic deformation and metamorphism. Because the stratigraphic sequence of the rocks remains obscure, it is difficult to resolve these highly deformed rocks into an orderly pattern of folding and faulting. According to Yen (1967), however, the surface structures of the Tailuko belt are characterized by open folding, whereas those of the Yuli belt are dominated by overturned folds with eastward vergence. Faults older than the regional metamorphism have been largely obliterated by later deformation, whereas faults that post-date metamorphism are readily recognized. These faults can be inferred at abrupt changes in lithology, orientation of foliation, or topographic relief. Tracing these faults across the whole metamorphic belt, however, is often handicapped by lack of key beds and by inaccessibility. Consequently no thorough-going faults of significant magnitude have been documented in the metamorphic complex, although some may exist.
In the northern part of the metamorphic complex, bedding and schistosity are nearly parallel, and trend generally east-west. The strike deviates locally to east-northeast, but more often to west-northwest. Dips of foliation and bedding vary considerably over wide areas. South of the Ilan-Hualien border along the Hopingchi stream (Tachoshuichi), major structural trends in the schists rotate to the northeast and north-northeast, in general conformity with the arcuate structural pattern of the Taiwan orogenic belt. Dips vary from 20o to 65o both to the northwest and the southeast. The precipitous rocky cliff along the eastern coast between Suao and Hualien is interprated to be a fault scarp with the west side up.
Deformation of the metamorphic complex must have taken place at great pressures and temperature with abundant magmatic fluids. No single plutonic process and no single structural episode could be responsible for the formation of this metamorphic complex. It is likely this is the result of the sum of many structural and plutonic processes, evolving over a long period of time.
A network of multiple fold generations and axial-plane foliations was established in recent field mapping and structural analysis in some parts of the metamorphic complex by Y. Wang (1979) and Stanley et al. (1981). The tectonic significance and ages of these diverse foliations and folds remain uncertain. They could be related to differences in position within major folds, original differences in lithology, or differences in degree of metamorphism. Some of the divergent trends could be the result of one single movement or they may indicate different orogenic pulses. Y. Wang (1979) attempts to associate each foliation trend with some phase of reported orogeny in the geological literature. The correlation of foliation trend with orogenic phase remains largely speculative, however, for lack of positive evidence, especially radiometric dates for the rocks involved. A more detailed classification and delineation of the different orogenic events in the metamorphic complex is therefore quite difficult. Thus all the orogenic phases suggested to date for the Tananao metamorphic terrain are conjectural to some extent.
The chloritoid-rich rocks in the marble and greenschist of the metamorphic complex in the Liwuchi may represent the end of an orogenic phase. They are considered a possible metamorphosed aluminous lateritic deposit. As mentioned above, P. Y. Chen and Liou (1979) postulated that the chemical properties and mode of occurrence of the chloritoid rocks indicate that they are a metamorphosed old soil deposit developed at an unconformity over the marble and greenschist. The distribution of the chloritoid rocks, however, is very limited. It is still difficult to depict the exact nature, extent, magnitude, and age significance of this postulated structural and stratigraphic break in the basement complex. It may represent the unconformity contact suggested by Wang-Lee between the Changchun Formation and the Chiuchu Formation.
One of the most notable orogenic events in Taiwan is the Late Mesozoic Nanao Orogeny, the diastrophism affecting the pre-Tertiary metamorphic basement before deposition of the Tertiary argillite-slate cover sequence. This is the main orogeny during which the pre-Tertiary rocks were tectonized to form the metamorphic basement of the Tertiary fold-and-thrust belt on the Eurasian plate. The Nanao Orogeny, named after the village of Nanao on the northeastern coast of Taiwan, may correspond to one phase of the important Yenshan orogeny in mainland China.
There is no argument about the existence of a major unconformity between the metamorphic basement and its subjacent Tertiary cover series. There is current controversy, however, over whether this unconformable contact has been overprinted or obscured by a later thrust fault, and whether this fault, if present, is of local or regional significance. Yen et al. (1956) and Suppe et al. (1976) demonstrated an unconformable contact between the metamorphic basement and the slaty cover rocks at Suao on the northeast coast and at one locality on the central cross-island highway. The evidence includes the presence of quartz-bearing basal conglomerate, truncation of units at the contact, and multiple folding in the basement in contrast to single- phase folding in the cover rocks. The basal conglomerate is called the "M Conglomerate" by Yen and others (1956) to manifest the unconformity of the Nanao orogeny. However, many other workers have pointed out that this unconformity has been largely overprinted and masked by a later thrust fault in most places (Tsan, 1977 Chao-Hsia Chen, 1979a; Hashimoto et al., 1975). A discussion of this debate is given in the text "Tectonic evolution of Taiwan" (Ho, 1982) and will not be discussed in detail here. Field evidence of the basement/slate unconformity is rather obscure, as the older schist series structurally overlies the younger slate series in general, both dipping in the same direction along a large extent of the contact. In some areas, shearing, recrystallization and fabric reorientation may have wiped out the evidence of unconformity and may have created a false semblance of conformity. It is fairly certain, however, that the thick slate series that constitutes the main part of the Central Range is unconformable with respect to the metamorphic basement. The thrust faulting along the contact is a secondary tectonic feature superimposed on the unconformity, which can be observed only where it has not been obscured by later faulting.

conformance level 'A+' :::© CENTRAL GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, MOEA P.O.BOX 968, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
No. 2, Ln. 109, Huaxin St.,Zhonghe Dist., New Taipei City 235,Taiwan(R.O.C)
TEL: +886-2-29462793FAX: +886-2-29429291 E-mail:cgs@moeacgs.gov.tw
The best browsing mode is 1024*768
Site visited : 0003870276 Last maintained : 2012-02-03